The ASCA Pilot is intended to provide increased confidence in testing results from ASCA-accredited testing laboratories, as well as decrease the burden of individual premarket submissions when manufacturers rely on testing completed by ASCA-accredited testing laboratories.
The FDA recently issued four final guidance documents governing 510(k) regulatory submissions, covering the Special, Abbreviated and Traditional 510(k) pathways, as well as the Refuse to Accept Policy for 510(k)s.
This article examines the CDRH draft guidance Safer Technologies Program for Medical Devices (STeP) and what it means for medtech manufacturers.
Although the structure of ISO 13485 will expand from the current eight main clauses to ten, most of the QMS requirements should essentially remain the same.
Every organization that is regulated by the FDA must consider sources of contamination and cross-contamination in their manufacturing operations. A robust personnel hygiene program is an important element for good manufacturing practices (GMPs) necessary to prevent contamination and cross-contamination, in order to ensure the safety of medicinal products.
An FDA inspection is very different than an ISO certification or surveillance audit — too often, organizations “prepare” for scheduled ISO audits by playing catch-up on activities that have been neglected or otherwise overlooked. The catch-up strategy will be problematic for FDA inspections.
The FDA inspected your firm, and one or more FDA Form 483 inspectional observations were noted by its team. This article provides guidance on how to minimize or avoid additional enforcement actions.
The Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) is recognized by officially approved Auditing Organizations (ISO Registrars) to conduct a single regulatory audit, of a medical device manufacturer, that satisfies relevant requirements of the regulatory authorities participating in the program.
This article presents the requirements regarding documentation of QMS procedures and work instructions and then introduces methods that can be used to effectively document compliant procedures.
Many organizations with very robust QMSs routinely find themselves in a state of disarray and facing compliance issues when key members of the quality leadership team leave the organization.
For a supplier management program to provide added value to an organization, the supplier evaluation should look beyond the requirements of a standard or regulation.
This article will first present the definitions and requirements regarding risk pertaining to the control of suppliers and then introduce some tools to incorporate and integrate risk management techniques within the QMS specifically applied to supplier management/purchasing controls.
The real issue in developing a QMS failure mode effects analysis (qFMEA) for the quality management system is how to develop the scales traditionally used to calculate the risk priority number.
This article will first present the definitions and requirements regarding risk and then introduce some tools that can be utilized to incorporate and integrate risk management techniques in and throughout the QMS.
FDA regulations, ISO standards, and GHTF guidance documents do not prescribe the number of runs required for process validation activities. Industry has typically used three batches during the process performance qualification phase to demonstrate that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality product, but the so-called "rule of three" is no longer appropriate for process validation activities.